Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms HD Graphics 505 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 1043 days older than HD Graphics 505.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 505
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 6 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 1000% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than HD Graphics 505 - 11 vs 1 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
HD Graphics 505
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2016
Radeon R9 290X
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 505
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
1.95 GPixel/s
3%
Texel Fillrate
11.7 GTexel/s
6%
Intel HD Graphics 505 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $549 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
