Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260X outperforms HD Graphics 505 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260X is 1059 days older than HD Graphics 505.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 505
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 6 vs 115 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Performs up to 67% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than HD Graphics 505 - 15 vs 9 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
15
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$246.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $246.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
1.95 GPixel/s
11%
Texel Fillrate
11.7 GTexel/s
18%
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 505 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $139 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |