Key Differences
In short — Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A380 is 4522 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 23% better in Dota 2 than GeForce GT 220 - 172 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 6 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Arc A380 - 58 vs 75 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Arc A380
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
7.3170731707317085%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
10.975609756097562%
Intel Arc A380 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 14th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2010 |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
| $149 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR3 |
| 96-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
186 GB/s | Bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 600 MHz |
| 2050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
