Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms GeForce GTX 950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A310 is 2610 days newer than GeForce GTX 950.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than GeForce GTX 950 - 557 vs 533 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 30 vs 90 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 4 vs 2 GB
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Arc A310
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
GeForce GTX 950
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Arc A310
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
73.64544976328247%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
98.21115398105927%
GeForce GTX 950
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 20th, 2015 |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 900 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
| 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1024 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1653 MHz |
