In Dead Space, the HD Graphics 530 is much faster than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
HD Graphics 530
- Up to 300% faster in Dead Space – 44 vs 11 FPS
- Up to 300% faster in Dead Space
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 15 vs 31 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
GeForce 210
No clear advantages
Dead Space FPS Calculator
HD Graphics 530 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
HD Graphics 530 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
HD Graphics 530 vs GeForce 210: Comparison of core performance specifications
HD Graphics 530
Sep 1st, 2015
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
2.85 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
22.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
364.8 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
73%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
18%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
11%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
HD Graphics 530 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce 210 Oct 12th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Skylake) | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15W | Power Consumption | 31W |
