The HD Graphics 510 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the HD Graphics 510
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 15 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
HD Graphics 510 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
HD Graphics 510
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
39
61%
Min 1% FPS
15
48%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, $
$343.82
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.37/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$343.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$224.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$273.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.12
In Stock
HD Graphics 510 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The HD Graphics 510 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The HD Graphics 510 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
HD Graphics 510
Sep 1st, 2015
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
1.9 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
11.4 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
182.4 GFLOPS
6%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
HD Graphics 510 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.9 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
| 11.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
| 182.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
