The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 50 vs 120 Watts
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
28%
Min 1% FPS
20
19%
Price, $
$82.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$82.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$193.99
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
32.98 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
4%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $79.00 |
| GeForce 40 Mobile | Generation | Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
576 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
189.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
515.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
32.98 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
