In Atomfall, the GeForce RTX 4080 is much faster than the Arc A310. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $1680 more expensive!
GeForce RTX 4080
- Up to 329% faster in Atomfall – 146 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 329% faster in Atomfall
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Arc A310
- Is 3 weeks and 1 day newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Sep 20, 2022
- Is 3 weeks and 1 day newer
- Up to 94% cheaper – $109.99 vs $1789.99
- Up to 94% cheaper
- Up to 74% better value in Atomfall – $3.23 vs $12.26/FPS
- Up to 74% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 30 vs 320 Watts
- Consumes up to 91% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce RTX 4080 vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce RTX 4080
Sep 20th, 2022
Average FPS
146 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
109 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1789.99
6%
Value, $/FPS
$12.26/FPS
26%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
34 FPS
23%
Min 1% FPS
26 FPS
24%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce RTX 4080 vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce RTX 4080 vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce RTX 4080
Sep 20th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
716.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
48.74 TFLOPS
100%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
17%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
6%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce RTX 4080 Sep 20th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 20th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $1,199.00 | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 40 | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 320W | Power Consumption | 30W |
