The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 50 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
96
92%
Min 1% FPS
53
91%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, $
$209.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$209.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$239.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
43%
Pixel Fillrate
84.24 GPixel/s
69%
Texture Fillrate
140.4 GTexel/s
46%
FP32
8.986 TFLOPS
92%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 40 Mobile | Generation | Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 96-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 84.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 140.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 8.986 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
