The GeForce RTX 3090 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 2100, however, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $1755.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 96% cheaper – $74.98 vs $1829.99
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 35 vs 350 Watts
GeForce RTX 3090 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
162
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, $
$1829.99
4%
Value, $/FPS
$11.29/FPS
15%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
28%
Min 1% FPS
18
18%
Price, $
$74.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 3090 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 3090 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 3090 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.58 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
8%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
4%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 3090 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| $1,499.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| GeForce 30 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 350 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Memory | ||
24 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6X | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
936.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
189.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.5 GPixel/s |
556 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 39.01 GTexel/s |
35.58 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.248 TFLOPS |
