The GeForce RTX 3070 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3100 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $879.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Up to 88% cheaper – $120.99 vs $999.99
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 65 vs 220 Watts
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 3070
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
129
100%
Min 1% FPS
76
100%
Price, $
$999.99
12%
Value, $/FPS
$7.75/FPS
33%
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Average FPS
47
36%
Min 1% FPS
20
26%
Price, $
$120.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 3070
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
20.31 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
21%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
6%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 3070 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
$499.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
GeForce 30 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
220 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
165.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.5 GPixel/s |
317.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 39.01 GTexel/s |
20.31 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.248 TFLOPS |