The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $109.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 36% cheaper – $189.99 vs $299.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 70 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is better in every way
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon R9 290 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$189.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$312.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$230.52
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$190.39
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$213.01
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon R9 290 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon R9 290 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon R9 290 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
52%
Pixel Fillrate
47.04 GPixel/s
78%
Texture Fillrate
105.8 GTexel/s
70%
FP32
6.774 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
72%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 2nd, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
GeForce 30 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
70 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
96-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
168 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
47.04 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 60.61 GPixel/s |
105.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 151.5 GTexel/s |
6.774 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.849 TFLOPS |