In Atomfall, the GeForce RTX 2070 is slower than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $148 more expensive!
GeForce RTX 2070
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 175 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Arc A750
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 76 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Oct 17, 2018
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 22% cheaper – $526.72 vs $675.00
- Up to 22% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Atomfall – $6.93 vs $10.71/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce RTX 2070 vs Arc A750: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Average FPS
63 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
82%
Price, $
$675
78%
Value, $/FPS
$10.71/FPS
65%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$526.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.93/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce RTX 2070 vs Arc A750: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce RTX 2070 vs Arc A750: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
103.7 GPixel/s
39%
Texture Fillrate
233.3 GTexel/s
43%
FP32
7.465 TFLOPS
43%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce RTX 2070 Oct 17th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A750 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 17th, 2018 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| GeForce 20 | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
