The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 460. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 30 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is better in every way
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 460 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Dec 17th, 2021
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
76%
Min 1% FPS
22
67%
Price, $
$172.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.37/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 460 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 460 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 460 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Dec 17th, 2021
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.84 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
79.68 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.1 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
48%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
84%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
42%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 17th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 20 Mobile | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
39.84 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.2 GPixel/s |
79.68 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 67.2 GTexel/s |
5.1 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.15 TFLOPS |
