The GeForce MX450 25W is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 25 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce MX450 25W vs GeForce GTX 1070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce MX450 25W
Aug 15th, 2020
Average FPS
51
62%
Min 1% FPS
22
51%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1070
Jun 10th, 2016
Average FPS
82
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, $
$519
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.32/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$519.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$399.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$569.00
In Stock
GeForce MX450 25W vs GeForce GTX 1070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce MX450 25W vs GeForce GTX 1070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce MX450 25W vs GeForce GTX 1070 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce MX450 25W
Aug 15th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
31%
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
28%
Texture Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
26%
FP32
1.667 TFLOPS
26%
GeForce GTX 1070
Jun 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
202 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.463 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce MX450 25W | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 10th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $379.00 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.76 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
| 52.08 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 202 GTexel/s |
| 1.667 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.463 TFLOPS |
