In Battlefield 6, the GeForce MX350 is much slower than the Radeon RX Vega 64. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce MX350
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer – Feb 10, 2020 vs Aug 07, 2017
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 20 vs 295 Watts
- Consumes up to 93% less energy
Radeon RX Vega 64
- Up to 5000% faster in Battlefield 6 – 51 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 5000% faster in Battlefield 6
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX Vega 64: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX Vega 64: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX Vega 64: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
12%
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
1.1994 TFLOPS
9%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce MX350 Feb 10th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 Aug 7th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 10th, 2020 | Released | Aug 7th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $499.00 |
| GeForce MX (3xx) | Generation | Vega (RX Vega) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
20 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
