In Atomfall, the GeForce MX330 is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce MX330
- Consumes up to 96% less energy – 10 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 96% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 291% faster in Atomfall – 86 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 291% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Feb 10, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce MX330 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce MX330 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce MX330 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce MX330
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
11%
Pixel Fillrate
25.5 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
38.26 GTexel/s
6%
FP32
1.2242 TFLOPS
6%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce MX330 Feb 10th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 10th, 2020 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce MX (3xx) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
10 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
