The GeForce MX150 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce MX150
- Consumes up to 96% less energy – 10 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R9 290 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce MX150
May 17th, 2017
Average FPS
46
71%
Min 1% FPS
19
59%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R9 290 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R9 290 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R9 290 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce MX150
May 17th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
40.1 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
16.61 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
24.91 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
797.2 GFLOPS
16%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce MX150 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
10 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 60.61 GPixel/s |
| 24.91 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 151.5 GTexel/s |
| 797.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 4.849 TFLOPS |
