In The Last of Us Part II, the GeForce MX150 is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce MX150
- Consumes up to 96% less energy – 10 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 96% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 7500% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 76 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 7500% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs May 17, 2017
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
GeForce MX150 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce MX150 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce MX150 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce MX150
May 17th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
40.1 GB/s
8%
Pixel Fillrate
16.61 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
24.91 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
797.2 GFLOPS
4%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce MX150 May 17th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 17th, 2017 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce MX (1xx) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
10 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
