In The Last of Us Part II, the GeForce MX110 is much slower than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce MX110
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 7500% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 76 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 7500% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Nov 17, 2017
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
GeForce MX110 vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce MX110 vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce MX110 vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce MX110
Nov 17th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
40.1 GB/s
8%
Pixel Fillrate
8.048 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
16.1 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
515.1 GFLOPS
3%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce MX110 Nov 17th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2017 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce MX (1xx) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
