The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 7100, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $824.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Up to 83% cheaper – $173.99 vs $998.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 130 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
100%
Min 1% FPS
42
100%
Price, $
$998
17%
Value, $/FPS
$12.47/FPS
21%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
82%
Min 1% FPS
32
76%
Price, $
$173.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.63/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
39%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
95%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
95%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
$649.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
250 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
336.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
103.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.78 GPixel/s |
189.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 179 GTexel/s |
6.06 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.728 TFLOPS |