The GeForce GTX 970M is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 970M
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce GTX 970M vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 970M
Oct 7th, 2014
Average FPS
55
86%
Min 1% FPS
25
81%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, $
$224.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$224.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$343.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$273.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.12
In Stock
GeForce GTX 970M vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 970M vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 970M vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 970M
Oct 7th, 2014
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
120.3 GB/s
94%
Pixel Fillrate
49.82 GPixel/s
94%
Texture Fillrate
83.04 GTexel/s
89%
FP32
2.657 TFLOPS
89%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 970M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 7th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 120.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 49.82 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
| 83.04 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
| 2.657 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
