The GeForce GTX 965M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 7100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 965M
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Average FPS
51
77%
Min 1% FPS
23
72%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, $
$173.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.63/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
36%
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
93%
Texture Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
41%
FP32
0%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 965M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 36.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.78 GPixel/s |
| 73.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 179 GTexel/s |
| 0 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.728 TFLOPS |
