The GeForce GTX 965M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 965M
The Radeon Pro W5700 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Average FPS
51
52%
Min 1% FPS
23
43%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, $
$259.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
18%
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
0%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 965M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 36.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 73.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 0 GFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
