The GeForce GTX 965M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 965M
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Average FPS
51
61%
Min 1% FPS
23
52%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$349.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$423.74
In Stock
GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
28%
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
43%
Texture Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
43%
FP32
0%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 965M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 36.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 73.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 0 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
