In Atomfall, the GeForce GTX 965M is quite a bit slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GTX 965M
No clear advantages
Arc A310
- Up to 42% faster in Atomfall – 34 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 42% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Jan 09, 2015
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 965M vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
34 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
25 FPS
100%
Price, $
$118.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.49/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 965M vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 965M vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 9th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
65%
Pixel Fillrate
30.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
60.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.946 TFLOPS
72%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
92%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
92%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 965M Jan 9th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2015 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| – | Power Consumption | 30 W |
