The GeForce GTX 960 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3100, however, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $135.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 960
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Up to 53% cheaper – $119.99 vs $255.00
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 65 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, $
$255
47%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
55%
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Average FPS
47
85%
Min 1% FPS
20
80%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.55/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon Pro WX 3100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.413 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
52%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
52%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 960 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 22nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
37.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.5 GPixel/s |
75.39 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 39.01 GTexel/s |
2.413 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.248 TFLOPS |
