The GeForce GTX 880M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 2100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 880M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 122 Watts
GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 880M
Mar 12th, 2014
Average FPS
50
100%
Min 1% FPS
22
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
90%
Min 1% FPS
18
82%
Price, $
$74.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 880M
Mar 12th, 2014
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
31.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
127.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.05 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
30%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
61%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
41%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 880M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 122 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
31.78 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.5 GPixel/s |
127.1 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 39.01 GTexel/s |
3.05 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.248 TFLOPS |
