The GeForce GTX 870M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 870M
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 100 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 3 GB
GeForce GTX 870M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 870M
Mar 12th, 2014
Average FPS
48
58%
Min 1% FPS
20
45%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$349.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.99
In Stock
GeForce GTX 870M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 870M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 870M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 870M
Mar 12th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
120 GB/s
42%
Pixel Fillrate
27.08 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
108.3 GTexel/s
64%
FP32
2.599 TFLOPS
48%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 870M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 12th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
100 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 120 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 27.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 108.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 2.599 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
