The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 100 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 3 GB
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Nov 7th, 2013
Average FPS
63
88%
Min 1% FPS
30
81%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$290.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.04/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Nov 7th, 2013
Memory
3 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
55.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
222.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.345 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
57%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
99%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 780 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 7th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
$699.00 | MSRP | $159.00 |
GeForce 700 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
250 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
Memory | ||
3 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
384-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
336.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
55.68 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 55.2 GPixel/s |
222.7 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 138 GTexel/s |
5.345 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.416 TFLOPS |