The GeForce GTX 760M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3200. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 760M
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 760M
May 30th, 2013
Average FPS
43
88%
Min 1% FPS
17
81%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$137.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.81/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 760M
May 30th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
64.13 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
11.5 GPixel/s
56%
Texture Fillrate
46.02 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.104 TFLOPS
67%
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
90%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 760M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 30th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $199.00 |
GeForce 700M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
64.13 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
11.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.72 GPixel/s |
46.02 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 41.44 GTexel/s |
1.104 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.658 TFLOPS |