The GeForce GTX 690 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 690
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 285 vs 300 Watts
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 690 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 690
May 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
52
30%
Min 1% FPS
23
21%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
175
100%
Min 1% FPS
109
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 690 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 690 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 690 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 690
May 3rd, 2012
Memory
2 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
192.3 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
32.61 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
130.4 GTexel/s
21%
FP32
3.13 TFLOPS
8%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
40.09 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 690 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| $999.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 300 W | Power Consumption | 285 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 192.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 32.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 208.8 GPixel/s |
| 130.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 626.4 GTexel/s |
| 3.13 TFLOPS | FP32 | 40.09 TFLOPS |
