The GeForce GTX 680M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 680M
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 100 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 680M
Jun 4th, 2012
Average FPS
47
45%
Min 1% FPS
20
34%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, $
$239
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$239.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 680M
Jun 4th, 2012
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
115.2 GB/s
26%
Pixel Fillrate
21.22 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
84.9 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
2.038 TFLOPS
21%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 680M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
100 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 115.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 21.22 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 84.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 2.038 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
