The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 64. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 150 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 64 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Aug 16th, 2012
Average FPS
50
56%
Min 1% FPS
22
45%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, $
$472.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.25/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Aug 16th, 2012
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
30%
Pixel Fillrate
27.44 GPixel/s
28%
Texture Fillrate
109.8 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
2.634 TFLOPS
21%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 16th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
$299.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Vega |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 144.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 27.44 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 98.94 GPixel/s |
| 109.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 395.8 GTexel/s |
| 2.634 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.66 TFLOPS |
