The GeForce GTX 650 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 650
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 65 vs 575 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 650 vs GeForce RTX 5090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 650
Nov 27th, 2013
Average FPS
42
17%
Min 1% FPS
16
10%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
242
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, $
$4860
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20.08/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$4,860.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,058.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,499.99
In Stock
GeForce GTX 650 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 650 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 650 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 650
Nov 27th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
3%
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
8.464 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
33.86 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
812.5 GFLOPS
1%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 650 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 32 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1790 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 8.464 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 423.6 GPixel/s |
| 33.86 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1637 GTexel/s |
| 812.5 GFLOPS | FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS |
