The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5500. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 110 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Oct 9th, 2012
Average FPS
45
62%
Min 1% FPS
18
49%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$161.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.21/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5500 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Oct 9th, 2012
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
14.85 GPixel/s
25%
Texture Fillrate
59.39 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
1.425 TFLOPS
27%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.224 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 650 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 9th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
110 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.85 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 59.36 GPixel/s |
| 59.39 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 163.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.425 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.224 TFLOPS |
