The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 960 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $446.12 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 560 Ti
The GeForce GTX 960 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 960
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 64% cheaper – $255.00 vs $701.12
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 120 vs 170 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Average FPS
41
75%
Min 1% FPS
16
64%
Price, $
$701.12
36%
Value, $/FPS
$17.1/FPS
27%
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, $
$255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
128.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
13.17 GPixel/s
35%
Texture Fillrate
52.67 GTexel/s
70%
FP32
1.263 TFLOPS
52%
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.2 GB/s
87%
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.413 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 560 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 25th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 22nd, 2015 |
| $249.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 170 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
128.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 13.17 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 37.7 GPixel/s |
| 52.67 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 75.39 GTexel/s |
| 1.263 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.413 TFLOPS |
