The GeForce GTX 465 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 465
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 200 vs 575 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce RTX 5090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 465
May 31st, 2010
Average FPS
40
17%
Min 1% FPS
15
9%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
242
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, $
$4860
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20.08/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$4,860.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,049.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,499.99
In Stock
GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 465
May 31st, 2010
Memory
1 GB
3%
Memory Bandwidth
102.7 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
13.38 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
26.75 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
855.4 GFLOPS
1%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 465 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| GeForce 400 | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
200 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 32 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 102.7 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1790 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 13.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 423.6 GPixel/s |
| 26.75 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1637 GTexel/s |
| 855.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS |
