The GeForce GTX 460M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 4100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 460M
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 460M
Sep 3rd, 2010
Average FPS
40
82%
Min 1% FPS
15
71%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$120.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 460M
Sep 3rd, 2010
Memory
1.5 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
60 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
5.4 GPixel/s
28%
Texture Fillrate
21.6 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
518.4 GFLOPS
21%
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 460M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 50 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1.5 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 60 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.22 GPixel/s |
| 21.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 76.86 GTexel/s |
| 518.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.46 TFLOPS |
