The GeForce GTX 460M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 460M
- Consumes up to 76% less energy – 50 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 433% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 460M
Sep 3rd, 2010
Average FPS
40
41%
Min 1% FPS
15
28%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, $
$259.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 460M
Sep 3rd, 2010
Memory
1.5 GB
19%
Memory Bandwidth
60 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
5.4 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
21.6 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
518.4 GFLOPS
6%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 460M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1.5 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 60 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 21.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 518.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
