Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro WX 9100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 592 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 9100.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 50% better value when playing Starfield than Radeon Pro WX 9100 - $13.30 vs $26.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 - 120 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 16 vs 6 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
30
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
Buy for $796.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 327 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
88%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
44%
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | $1599 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | HBM2 |
192-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |