In Deathloop, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is slower than the Arc A770. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $90 cheaper!
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 32% cheaper – $189.99 vs $279.99
- Up to 32% cheaper
- Up to 9% better value in Deathloop – $1.86 vs $2.05/FPS
- Up to 9% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 120 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 47% less energy
Arc A770
- Up to 33% faster in Deathloop – 136 vs 102 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Feb 22, 2019
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 6 GB
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory
Deathloop FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Arc A770: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
102 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
77 FPS
76%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
101 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279.99
67%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
91%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Arc A770: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Arc A770: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
56%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
28%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
28%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Feb 22nd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A770 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120W | Power Consumption | 225W |
