In Atomfall, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is quite a bit faster than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
- Up to 41% faster in Atomfall – 48 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Atomfall
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory
Arc A310
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
48 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
36 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
34 FPS
71%
Min 1% FPS
25 FPS
69%
Price, $
$118.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.49/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.884 TFLOPS
100%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
43%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
37%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
55%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| – | Power Consumption | 30 W |
