The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W6400
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is better in every way
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
74
100%
Min 1% FPS
38
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
86%
Min 1% FPS
32
84%
Price, $
$229.59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.58/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W6400 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
86%
Texture Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.101 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
87%
FP32
3.58 TFLOPS
87%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.59 GPixel/s |
128.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.9 GTexel/s |
4.101 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.58 TFLOPS |
