Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6400 is 657 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6400 - 50 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Radeon RX 6400
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 53 vs 50 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
69%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Radeon RX 6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Navi II |
Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1923 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2321 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |