Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 997 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 - 50 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Performs up to 13% better in Valorant than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 657 vs 583 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 16 vs 4 GB
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
FPS
657
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
20%
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $1599 |
None | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | HBM2 |
128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |