The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Apr 2nd, 2020
Average FPS
62
36%
Min 1% FPS
30
29%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, $
$1909.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.23/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Apr 2nd, 2020
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
28%
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
20%
Texture Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
15%
FP32
2.458 TFLOPS
7%
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
32.98 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 38.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| 76.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 515.3 GTexel/s |
| 2.458 TFLOPS | FP32 | 32.98 TFLOPS |
