The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 460 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $118.97 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- Up to 41% cheaper – $172.02 vs $290.99
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 75 vs 100 Watts
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 460 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$290.99
59%
Value, $/FPS
$4.04/FPS
83%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
71%
Min 1% FPS
22
59%
Price, $
$172.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.37/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 460 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 460 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 460 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
58%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
35%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
49%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
49%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 460 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
$159.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
100 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
55.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.2 GPixel/s |
138 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 67.2 GTexel/s |
4.416 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.15 TFLOPS |