Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 7100 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 1252 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 - 30 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 55 vs 52 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$177.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $177.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
40%
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $799 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1243 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |