The GeForce GTX 1070 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 260X and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $330.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Up to 62% cheaper – $199.99 vs $529.99
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 115 vs 150 Watts
GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon R7 260X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1070
Jun 10th, 2016
Average FPS
82
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, $
$529.99
37%
Value, $/FPS
$6.46/FPS
63%
Buy on Amazon
$529.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$499.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$399.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$569.00
In Stock
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
60%
Min 1% FPS
21
49%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.08/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon R7 260X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon R7 260X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1070 vs Radeon R7 260X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1070
Jun 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
202 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.463 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
41%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
30%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1070 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
$379.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
GeForce 10 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
256.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
107.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.6 GPixel/s |
202 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 61.6 GTexel/s |
6.463 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.971 TFLOPS |